MANAGING CHILDREN CREATIVITY FOR NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT IN COVID 19 ERA THROUGH RE-ENGINEERING EDUCATION AT PRIMARY SCHOOL LEVEL IN ANAMBRA STATE
Umeozor, Uzonna Juliana
08035085408 julzyiana@yahoo.com Department of Educational Management and Policy Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka, Anambra State
Onuh, Uchenna Becky
Tansian University, Umunya, Anambra State
The role of primary education towards development of children creativity for national development cannot be overemphasized. Notwithstanding this important role, yet primary education in this COVID 19 era suffers a lot of dismay especially in the provision of quality education. This poor situation has warranted the present study to investigate the need for managing children creativity for national development in COVID 19 era through re-engineering education at the primary school level in Anambra State. Three purposes and research questions guided the study. A descriptive survey research design was employed in the study. Population of the study comprised 1,067 head teachers and 8,396 teachers from 1,067 public primary schools within the 6 education zones in Anambra State. Sample of the study consisted of 213 head teachers and 420 teachers from 213 primary schools selected at 20% and 5% from the entire head teachers and teachers population using the proportionate stratified random sampling technique. A 24-item questionnaire titled ?Managing Children Creativity for National Development Questionnaire (MCCNDQ)? developed by the researchers and structured on a 4-point scale of Strongly Agree (SA), Agree (A), Disagree (D) and Strongly Disagree (SD) was used for data collection. Two experts from Educational Management and Policy Department, and one expert from Educational Foundations Department (Measurement & Evaluation expert), Faculty of Education, Nnamdi Azikiwe University validated the questionnaire. Reliability of the questionnaire was established through a pilot test using a sample of 4 head teachers and 20 teachers selected from four public primary schools in Enugu State. The scores obtained after the pilot-test were computed using Cronbach Alpha statistics which gave internal consistency reliability value of 0.85, 0.82 and 0.87 for each of the three clusters respectively and summed up to yield an overall reliability value of 0.85, showing that the questionnaire was reliable for conducting the study. Data collated were analyzed using mean scores rated at 2.50 and standard deviation. From the findings of this study which revealed various ways of managing children creativity for national development in COVID 19 era through re-engineering of education at the primary school level, recommendations were proffered. Among these include that the State government should support the funding of primary education in Anambra State through adequate budgetary allocation and financial assistance from the private sector, in order to encourage the use of technological educational resources such as internet, computers, tablets, computer graphics, among others, which is essential and necessary for managing children creativity for national development in COVID 19 era and for re-engineering education at the primary school level in Anambra State.
Abamba, G.O. &Okokoyo, I.E. (2012). Re-engineering primary education for productivity andselfemploymentinNigeria.Retrievedfromhttps://www.globalacademicgroup.com / pdf. Abosede, S.C. (2017). Quality control in early childhood education. British Journal of Education, 5 (8), 63-72. Published by European Centre for Research Training and Development UK. Retrieved from https://www.eajournals.org/wp- content/uploads/Quality-Control-in-Early-Childhood-Education.pdf Abraham, A. (2016). Gender and creativity: An overview of psychological and neuroscientific literature. Brain Imaging and Behavior, 10, 609-618. doi: 10.1007/s11682-015-9410-8. Al Ashmawi, H. (2009). Developing the creative thinking as a possible mission. Saudi Arabia: Magalat al Ma'rifah n. Asodike, J.D. &Ikpitibo, C.L. (2012). Basic issues in primary education delivery in Nigeria. European Scientific Journal January edition, 8 (1), 150-164. Bawa, S. (2021). National development. Retrieved from https://www.yourarticlelibrary.com/society/nation. Chao, C. C. (2009). Dimensions of innovation and creativity in TESOL: Views in eight teachers from Taiwanese higher education. English Teaching and Learning, 33 (2), 147-181. Charlile, O., & Jordan, A. (2012). Approaches to creativity: A guide for teachers. Maidenhead: Open University Press. Falconer, E.G., Cropley, D.H., & Dollard, M.F. (2018). An exploration of creativity in primary school children. International Journal of Creativity and Problem Solving, 28 (2), 7-25. Fautley, M., & Savage, J. (2007). Creativity in secondary education. Exeter: Learning Matters. Federal Republic of Nigeria (FRN, 2013). National policy on education (6th edition). Abuja: NERDC. Fitriah, F. (2018). The role of technology in teachers’ creativity development in English teaching practices. Retrieved from http://journal.teflin.org/index.php/journal/article/view/588. Hännikäinen, &Rasku-Puttonen, (2010). Promoting children's participation: the role of teachers in preschool and primary school learning sessions. Early Years, 30: (2) , 147 — 160. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/. Henriksen, D., Henderson, M., Creely, E., Ceretkova, S., Černochová, M., Sendova, E., Sointu, E.T. & Tienken, C.T. (2018). Creativity and technology in education: An International Perspective. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/. Hijazi, S.A. (2006). Psychology of creativity. Cairo: Dar al Fikr al Arabi. International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED, 2011). Primary education. Retrieved from https://learningportal.iiep.unesco.org/en/glossary/primary-education.
www.journal.fedunau.org Lapenienea, D. &Dumciene, A. (2014). Teachers’ creativity: Different approaches and similar results. Retrieved from https://pdf.sciencedirectassets.com/. Loveless, A. (2002). A literature review in creativity, new technologies and learning: A report for futurelab. Bristol: Futurelab. Manyara, C.O. & Murungi, C.G. (2018). Teacher’s motivation to use play as a medium of instruction. Int J Pregn& Chi Birth, 4 (6), 253‒260. Retrieved from https://medcraveonline.com/IPCB/IPCB-04-00136.pdf. Mishra, P. & Mehta, R. (2017). What we educators get wrong about 21st-century learning: Results of a survey. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 33 (1), 6–19. Ofie, L. (2005). Primary education for economic rehabilitation and reliance.Retrieved from world wide web. Orirmdu, F. (2004). Pre-primary and primary education in Nigeria. Kano: 1. A. Printing Press. Paliwal, N. (2018). National development. Retrieved from https://www.quora.com/What- is-national-development. Richards, J. C., & Cotterall, S. (2016). Exploring creativity in language teaching. In R.H. Jones & J.C. Richards (Eds.), Creativity in language teaching: Perspectives from research and practice (pp. 97-113). New York: Routledge. Riga, V. & Chronopoulou, E. (2014). Applying MacKinnon's 4Ps to foster creative thinking and creative behaviours in kindergarten children. Education, 42, 330-345. doi:10.1080/03004279.2012.692700. Saljo, R. (2010). Digital tools and challenges to institutional traditions of learning: Technologies, social memory and the performative nature of learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26 (1), 53-64. SlideShare from Scribd (2021). What is national development. Retrieved from https://www.slideshare.net/ricoalolor/what-is-the-national-development. Udebhulu, M. &Okinono, O. (2008) Education as a panacea for development.In Nigerian Sociological Review, no.1 & 2. Unsworth, K. (2001). Unpacking creativity. Academy of Management Review, 26 (2), 289- 297.
www.journal.fedunau.org Lapenienea, D. &Dumciene, A. (2014). Teachers’ creativity: Different approaches and similar results. Retrieved from https://pdf.sciencedirectassets.com/. Loveless, A. (2002). A literature review in creativity, new technologies and learning: A report for futurelab. Bristol: Futurelab. Manyara, C.O. & Murungi, C.G. (2018). Teacher’s motivation to use play as a medium of instruction. Int J Pregn& Chi Birth, 4 (6), 253‒260. Retrieved from https://medcraveonline.com/IPCB/IPCB-04-00136.pdf. Mishra, P. & Mehta, R. (2017). What we educators get wrong about 21st-century learning: Results of a survey. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 33 (1), 6–19. Ofie, L. (2005). Primary education for economic rehabilitation and reliance.Retrieved from world wide web. Orirmdu, F. (2004). Pre-primary and primary education in Nigeria. Kano: 1. A. Printing Press. Paliwal, N. (2018). National development. Retrieved from https://www.quora.com/What- is-national-development. Richards, J. C., & Cotterall, S. (2016). Exploring creativity in language teaching. In R.H. Jones & J.C. Richards (Eds.), Creativity in language teaching: Perspectives from research and practice (pp. 97-113). New York: Routledge. Riga, V. & Chronopoulou, E. (2014). Applying MacKinnon's 4Ps to foster creative thinking and creative behaviours in kindergarten children. Education, 42, 330-345. doi:10.1080/03004279.2012.692700. Saljo, R. (2010). Digital tools and challenges to institutional traditions of learning: Technologies, social memory and the performative nature of learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26 (1), 53-64. SlideShare from Scribd (2021). What is national development. Retrieved from https://www.slideshare.net/ricoalolor/what-is-the-national-development. Udebhulu, M. &Okinono, O. (2008) Education as a panacea for development.In Nigerian Sociological Review, no.1 & 2. Unsworth, K. (2001). Unpacking creativity. Academy of Management Review, 26 (2), 289- 297.